Thrown into the Murky Waters of Reference!

Oh yes.  It has been done.  Last Friday was my first official day (okay, two hours) on the dreaded Reference Desk.  I practically had to be dragged kicking and screaming onto the reference desk.  I’ve been so terrified of it, but my boss and my boss’s boss have been pushing me to do it…I think the reason why I was so scared was because that reference desk is the end all of places – if we can’t help you there, then that’s it for you – you’re totally screwed!  That’s way too much pressure!  I can’t have someone come to me for help, and what if I don’t know what to do?  Aggh!  I’ve been doing circulation for 10 years now – and I’ve always had the right to pass off anything research/reference related off to Reference, and rightfully so.   Sometimes I hate doing that, sometimes I’m okay with it.  Because I am the library geek and I *do* know practically where every single book lies in my library, I hate passing our patrons off to the reference desk at the other end of the building.  At the same time – I have my fellow circ workers who aren’t trained to look up books and do ref work – so the issue lies in that, if they see me doing it, they think they can do it too.  Which would be fine, except I’ve witnessed people doing it totally wrong – as in like, “I’m sorry, but there is no book called The Sixth Target by James Patterson, it does not exist in our catalog” – I cringe every time I hear something like that. (FYI – it’s listed as 6th Target, and because my catalog is crap, like most library catalogs, the thing doesn’t know that when I type in Sixth Target I do actually want 6th Target.  Unforgiving search engines FTL.)  I especially hate passing off things when I tell them to go to reference, and the patron stares over to the ref desk like it’s 90 miles away and say “nah, I’ll do it later” and walk out the door.  Makes me want to just tackle them down and say hang on!! 

Okay so anyway. Day 1 of Reference.  Went very smoothly – I wound up in the middle of a rush for a book that some professor demanded for a class – within 5 minutes all three copies in all three libraries were gone, on top of 3 additional holds placed on the book.  Crazy!  Someone wanted a copy of A Thousand Splendid Suns.  Done.  Someone wanted to reserve a study room. Done.  Someone needed a guest card to use the computers. Done.  My boss, who sat next to me, got a *real* reference question – someone wanted to know if local antique and jewelry stores were rated somehow…thank goodness I didn’t get that one.

So my first day on Reference wasn’t horrible – it was smooth sailing really.  It helped that I had two fabulous reference folk on either side of me too.  The best part about being on the reference desk was that I could really actually help people.  Circ and Ref are such totally different worlds.  At the circ desk, the patrons tend to treat you like dirt.  At the ref desk, the patrons are much more understanding and patient.  At the circ desk, I feel unable to really help them – I’m just the one checking out their stuff and telling them they owe $.30 for a book returned in 2003.  At the ref desk, I feel truly enabled to help people – and at the end of my two hours I really felt a glow from the feeling.   That may change once I wind up having to deal with the patron looking at porn on the computers or the 5 kids trashing the teen room…while I’ve known it all along, being on the desk really just confirmed that I really do love helping people, in any shape or form.  ^.^

LibraryThing!

Just came back from a Social Networking class presented by some great folks – John Blyberg from Darien Library, and Kate Sheehan from Danbury Public Library.  I hear the same things over and over again when I go to these talks – libraries just have to stay connected and stay with it!  We have to keep watching the way users, customers, patrons – whatever you want to call them – use the technology and how Web 2.0 changes it all.  Libraries have always offered service and books – users come to the library and check stuff out and that is all.  But times are a-changin’ – users want to do more.  They want to participate, comment, share their thoughts, provide feedback.  They want to find stuff in a way they can actually find it – have you ever looked at how a record in a library catalog looks?  The subject headings are so …authoritative.  And yes there’s the argument of needing controlled vocabulary – which I totally understand.  But there’s also nothing wrong with letting your patrons into your OPAC (that be Online Public Access Catalog, library-speak) – and letting them add tags, reviews, etc. to our books – just like you would on Amazon or YouTube or Flickr. 

Both John and Kate have got the idea – John created the “SOPAC” (S for Social) at the Ann Arbor District Library – www.aadl.org/catalog – and its catalog is just unbelievable – OPAC-wise.  Library vendors really need to step up and look at this, and give us these tools for all libraries, instead of the libraries that can afford to have people spend their time programming up their own OPAC.  Danbury Library, like most public libraries, doesn’t have the luxury of such a large technology team as AADL – but yet has managed to integrate at least a small part of Web 2.0 into their own library catalog.  http://cat.danburylibrary.org – look up any book, and you’ll find the regular, authoritative record at the top, but then at the bottom, there’s a tag cloud!  And you can search through the tag clouds!  With words that make sense, instead of “cookery”!   These tag clouds are generated from LibraryThing – if you are an avid book reader, you *have* to start using this.  You can keep track of the books you’ve read, provide reviews, tags – see what other people are reading who have similar tastes, etc.  I’ll be playing around with LibraryThing a lot more to see how truly beneficial it can be for our library (you can look me up under Miriella, if you so wish).  It’s definitely a step forward in the right direction to implementing and using 2.0.

I’m back!

But not for long – life is just too crazy.  Soon (as soon as I fix the PDF so you can’t see my real name :P) I’ll post up my my 16 page paper that I wrote on Second Life and Libraries…but I felt the need to write about books!  

Since I work in a library, and I’m working on getting my MLS from Drexel, I guess some people assume that I actually read books…for leisure, no less!  WTF?  Honestly though, I haven’t read as much as I’d like to since I’ve been in college…but I seem to be trying harder these days, and since I have a blog, I might as well start sharing what I am reading with you.  🙂  I tend to gravitate more towards non-fiction – a lot of self-help books and a lot of stories about people.  If I read fiction it is either a) required or b) complete and utter fluff (I have blown through the entire Shopaholic series…the first couple of books were fun but they’re getting old in a hurry – the last one I read just because I’m already invested in the series, ya know?).

So. First the boring ones.
Information ArchitectureInformation Architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing Large-Scale Web Sites [ILLUSTRATED] (Paperback)
by Louis Rosenfeld, Peter Morville

Reading this for class.  I probably shouldn’t admit it but yes, I’m in week three of my classes and I don’t think I’ve opened up this book yet.  😛  Will keep you updated.  It looks really great though.

Systems AnalysisSystems Analysis and Design Methods
by Jeffrey L. Whitten, Lonnie D. Bentley

I own two versions of books of this type already, since sadly, I’ve taken a “Introduction to Systems Analysis” class twice already.  Nothing spectacular to say, other than, if you want to know all there is to know about systems analysis and design, this is a great book.  

Time’s out at work, so sometime later this week I’ll post the books that are checked out on my library card (that I’m reading, even!).